Waging War: The Iraq War and its implications

The coupled States of America has always viewed itself as a Big Brother answerable for protecting others and helping them is desperate times. This whitethorn prove to be a intimately Samaritan act. However, at times, circumstances fightrant that things be make according to what is just. George Bernard Shaw at a time verbalize that the reasonable man adapts himself to the world provided the monstrous one persists in hard to adapt the world to himself that as a result, every progress dep supplants on the unreasonable man. In the course of history, this appears to be the fair play (Young, 1995). humankind Politics determine the kinship that exists among states today. Even the course of history is greatly affected by decisions pertaining to politics and transnational law. It has be amaze a determining agent in assessing the harmonious relationship amidst and among states, recognizing equality, sovereignty and respect for power and allowance (Jensen, 1982).Quite noniceab le is how, historically, States to what the United States has dictated. semipolitical camaraderie has always been utmost more(prenominal)(prenominal) important than plain public usefulness to subordinates and constituents. The Iraq War has magnified all the necessary details of unjust practice of impulse for political advancement and world pronouncement (Graham 2000).This paper seeks to discuss how the Iraq fight has non served its purpose at all, making it creation unjustified all the more netherstandable.The acquaint on Iraq war lies on the disappointment experience by the people. prexy George W. shrub has aggressively pointed out that the threat of weapons of the great unwashed destruction such as chemicals and biologic weapons, contribute to the misery of Iraq. This is be set of the circumstance that sanctions in connection with this threat has added significantly to the short living conditions of Iraqi people when it comes to the figure out of their freedom. President Bush labelled ibn Talal ibn Talal Hussein as a Madman in control of a very stark weapon and capable of spreading holy terror and strife. This argument has reached far and wide, magnifying the unjustified conditions of Iraqis under the leadership of Saddam Hussein. This is evident on the fact that for almost 25 gazillion inhabitants of Iraq, the per capita income is becoming less and less compared to five-spot or six years ago.Its thrift shrank to more than six percent and among its major(ip) problems are mortality, malnutrition and poverty. The life of the Iraqis on a daily basis has been tremendously difficult, far worse than its situation a ten ago. This is the main reason on which President Bush has hoped to bank on when persuade others to join in the United States quandary to wage war against Iraq.Now that everything has been done and over with, has it been a justifiable cause? The answer is a resounding no Primarily because the condition of Iraq has not alter after such war waged against it. more(prenominal) significant is the fact that mortality grade rush increased, hurting more American troops and Iraqis in the process. Terrorism has not decreased but all the more became rampant.Another argument is the catching of a madman on the loose. Saddam Hussein has been captured and his demise has not changed anything. Terrorism quieten exists, and his avid followers continue to enlarge long after he is gone. The end result- misery and struggle among the people. The war on Iraq is nothing but a political move to help ingest American economy, which is practically a war economy.The fact that waging war would solicit harbor from other countries means that America would once again flourish in the look of so many people mentation that the saviour is here again. But come to think of it, has anything resulted from such war? away from achieving President Bush goal of seeing Saddam in his demise, nothing else has been considered a productive result. The claim of existence of weapons of caboodle destruction has been proven futile. No deduction f such claim has been produced.In effect, what could be concluded is the fact that the United States has took advantage of the terrorism issue, magnified it and pointed it today on Iraq, so that people all over the world will see and unite with them in removing Saddam and waging war. Presently, what we have is an Iraq with a civilian government, a more free society but at the end of it all still looms the fact that people are suffering, having lost the individuation of a country invaded by external entities.The war on Iraq was based on less compelling reasons. At the cost of the people, President Bush has been successful in removing Saddam, but has he been successful large in making true his insure that suffering and poverty will be addressed and given proper firmness of purpose? NO.Years have already passed since the war, nut no improvement has been evident. The drink of the Iraqis now is far worse than when they had a dictator for a government.REFERENCESJensen, Lloyd. Explaining Foreign Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. apprentice Hall, 1982.Ray, James Lee. Democracies and International Conflict. Columbia University of to the southCarolina Press, 1995.Greenstein, Fred. Personality and Politics .Princeton, N.J Princeton University Press, 1987.Neustadt, Richard. Presidential Power. modern York Wiley, 1976.Graham, Allison. Essence of Decision. Boston Little Brown, 2000.Baumgartner, Frank. Agendas and unbalance in American Politics. lettuce University of Chicago Press, 1993.Young, Oran. System and Society in World Affairs Implications for International Organizations. New York Mc Millan 1995.